Successful food preparation depends on several things. Chief among them are
mastery of technique, proper tools and equipment, and most important of all, a
thorough understanding of ingredients. It is on this final point that our
confidence in wide-spread usability of Ron Paul begins to erode like a cake left
out in the rain; Paul presents such a tangle of conflicting, even contradictory flavors and textures
that he would throw any dish he was used in into the sort of baffled confusion we
confess we feel contemplating
him. Some flavors are instantly and consistently appealing, while others only inspire fervent acclaim inside a small
circle of true believers, leaving the rest of us with a feeling of slightly
frowning bemusement or even portentous disquiet. Some things are just like that. For
instance, unless you are used to a steady
diet of dried iguana snouts, smoked armadillo gizzards, or Ross Perot you may want to pass on
using them, and opt for something more traditional and predictable. Such is the
case with Paul; this is something quite out of the range of normal cookery, and
that may ring wrong on the palates of most diners who pay more than passing attention to what they're
swallowing.
The specimen in question is lean, with a legendary reputation for toughness only
exacerbated by decades of swimming against the current. While there seems to be
little of the dreaded K Street fat, one can expect considerable amounts
of faintly rancid gun oil and Roevwade bile overlaid with the odd scent off
admixed Ayn Rand and Bible.
Texas specialties are typically all over the map in terms of flavor and
universality of appeal;
for all those that draw a high rating in the rest of the country, a significant
percentage merit a tarnished lone star at best; in other words, for every
lip-smacking platter of Lyle Lovett we get
served a
sloppy bucket of G. W. Bush and a recycled pesticide jug of Tom DeLay. Paul’s regional appeal for barbecues, church
dinners, rewarmed blog buffets, and home school lunches may not translate well
to a larger range of diners for several reasons. Paul cuisine has an
isolationist edge that may render using even the most mildly foreign ingredients
at best problematical; there is also considerable debate as to how well it would work
with non-white American ingredients. In truth, Paul’s reaction to almost
everything is unfailingly negative: international cuisine; imported ingredients; big meals; government
standards such as
health and food safety. We can only conclude that served as a burger he would rail about
the over-redness of the catsup, demand that the pickle be born again as
something not kosher, and filibuster the french fries.
And yet for all of that there is some odd appeal here, much in the
manner of an extra pungent spice or flavor agent that is used cautiously and
infrequently, something typically kept in a tightly sealed jar in a dark, hard
to reach corner
of the spice cabinet--or safely down in Texas. A full Paul meal would be largely
indigestible to a majority of diners, the more peculiar and radically inedible
parts nervously pushed off to one side, soon making a wall around the edge of
their plates, and little of what was originally served consumed after all.
1 Fork -1 1/2 on a gold standard plate
Some appeal as an adventurous appetizer; may work in
conservatively portioned soups; entrées can have appealing exterior, but may
prove less palatable when the diner probes too deeply into the actual contents.
Gun Nut Clusters; Closed Bordelaise; Libertarian ‘n Onions;
Tax Code Upside Down Cake; Absolutely ANTIpasto; Deregulation Rehash; Federal
System Bombe
Nader has some of the same niche appeal, but far better overall flavor
(except for a ‘spoiler’ air some insists he carries); Perot has some of the same
flavors, but with more fizz and charts.
Goldschlagger; Shooters; Frozen Alliance Slushies; Lone
Star non-alcoholic beer
Warnings: May cause internationalists to break out in hives; may cause LaRouche’s Dementia in some heavy consumers; food for an America that never
really existed.
| Our
Rating System |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
| Contents
Copyright © 2008, all rights reserved, even those stolen by the Patriot
Act Celebrity Cooking Magazine and eatthefamous.org are a plausibly deniable division of Trollworks Global Media Conglomerated Syndicate and Interior Debating Society, a largely untraceable subsidiary of No Loaf Ink. Opinions expressed on this site are at least as valuable as those heard on Fox News, and should be taken seriously only by those with a sense of humor. Always exercise caution when dealing with cutting implements, kitchen appliances, and open flame. |
|||